Under
§ 419A(c)(2)(A), the reserve for post-retirement medical benefits is further limited by the requirement that it be determined on the basis of
current medical costs. In addition, for post-retirement life insurance the maximum insurance coverage that can be taken into account with respect to any covered employee is $50,000 of coverage. Moreover, in the case of post-retirement benefits for or on behalf of a key employee (as defined in § 416(i)(1)), §
419A(d) requires that a separate account be established for any medical or life
insurance benefits provided with respect to the key employee, and any medical or life insurance benefits provided with respect to the key employee after retirement may only be paid from the separate account. Under § 419A(e)(1), in order for
reserves for post-retirement medical and life insurance benefits to be taken into account the plan must meet the nondiscrimination requirements of § 505(b) with respect to those benefits (even if those requirements do not otherwise apply to the plan).
A plan meets the nondiscrimination requirements of § 505(b) only if (i) each class of benefits under the plan is provided under a classification of employees which is set forth in the plan and which is found by the Secretary not to be discriminatory in favor of employees who are highly compensated individuals, and (ii) in the case of each class of benefits, such benefits do not discriminate in favor of employees who are highly compensated individuals. Under § 505(b)(3), in the case of any benefit for which another section of the Code provides nondiscrimination rules (e.g., § 105(h) in the case of a self insured medical reimbursement plan), those rules apply instead with respect to the benefit. Under §§ 105(h)(8) and 414(t), all employees who are treated as
employed by a single employer under the rules of § 414(b), (c), or (m) are treated as employed by a single employer for purposes of §§ 105(h), 79, and 505. Sections 104(a)(3) and 105(b),(c), and (d) exclude from gross income certain amounts received by an employee through accident and health insurance. Section 105(e) provides that for purposes of §§ 104 and 105, amounts received through an “accident and health plan for employees” are treated as amounts received through accident or health insurance. Thus, the plan must exist primarily for the benefit of employees, as opposed to shareholders. See, e.g., Larkin v. Commissioner, 48 T.C. 629 (1967), aff’d, 394 F.2d 494 (1st Cir. 1968) (holding that the plan was merely a device to use corporate earnings to meet the anticipated medical needs of the shareholders).
Section 4976(a) imposes on an employer an excise tax in the amount of 100 percent of the amount of any disqualified benefit provided with respect to a welfare benefit fund maintained by the employer. Under § 4976(b)(1), a “disqualified benefit” means (i) any post-retirement medical benefit or life insurance benefit provided with respect to a key employee if a separate account is required to be established for the key employee under § 419A(d)
reserves for post-retirement medical and life insurance benefits to be taken into account the plan must meet the nondiscrimination requirements of § 505(b) with respect to those benefits (even if those requirements do not otherwise apply to the plan).
A plan meets the nondiscrimination requirements of § 505(b) only if (i) each class of benefits under the plan is provided under a classification of employees which is set forth in the plan and which is found by the Secretary not to be discriminatory in favor of employees who are highly compensated individuals, and (ii) in the case of each class of benefits, such benefits do not discriminate in favor of employees who are highly compensated individuals. Under § 505(b)(3), in the case of any benefit for which another section of the Code provides nondiscrimination rules (e.g., § 105(h) in the case of a self insured medical reimbursement plan), those rules apply instead with respect to the benefit. Under §§ 105(h)(8) and 414(t), all employees who are treated as
employed by a single employer under the rules of § 414(b), (c), or (m) are treated as employed by a single employer for purposes of §§ 105(h), 79, and 505. Sections 104(a)(3) and 105(b),(c), and (d) exclude from gross income certain amounts received by an employee through accident and health insurance. Section 105(e) provides that for purposes of §§ 104 and 105, amounts received through an “accident and health plan for employees” are treated as amounts received through accident or health insurance. Thus, the plan must exist primarily for the benefit of employees, as opposed to shareholders. See, e.g., Larkin v. Commissioner, 48 T.C. 629 (1967), aff’d, 394 F.2d 494 (1st Cir. 1968) (holding that the plan was merely a device to use corporate earnings to meet the anticipated medical needs of the shareholders).
Section 4976(a) imposes on an employer an excise tax in the amount of 100 percent of the amount of any disqualified benefit provided with respect to a welfare benefit fund maintained by the employer. Under § 4976(b)(1), a “disqualified benefit” means (i) any post-retirement medical benefit or life insurance benefit provided with respect to a key employee if a separate account is required to be established for the key employee under § 419A(d)
IRS Logo
ReplyDeleteSubscriptions
Language
Information For...
Advanced
Filing
Payments
Refunds
Credits & Deductions
News & Events
Forms & Pubs
Help & Resources
for Tax Pros
News Essentials
What's Hot
News Releases
IRS - The Basics
IRS Guidance
Media Contacts
Facts & Figures
Problem Alerts
Around the Nation
e-News Subscriptions
The Newsroom Topics
Multimedia Center
Noticias en EspaƱol
Radio PSAs
Tax Scams
The Tax Gap
Fact Sheets
IRS Tax Tips
Armed Forces
Latest News Home
Like Share Print
2011 Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Initiative
Due to the potential impact of Hurricane Irene, the IRS on Aug. 26 extended the due date for offshore voluntary disclosure initiative (OVDI) requests until Sept. 9, 2011. On Aug. 29, the IRS further clarified that the Sept. 9 extension also applied to taxpayers filing delinquent FBARs pursuant to questions 17 and 18 in the questions and answers.
Taxpayers seeking to participate in the OVDI needed to take the following actions by Sept. 9, 2011:
Identifying information needed to be submitted to the Criminal Investigation office. This includes name, address, date of birth and Social Security number and as much of the other information requested in the Offshore Voluntary Disclosures Letter as possible. This information needed to be sent to:
Internal Revenue Service
Criminal Investigation
ATTN: Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Coordinator
Philadelphia Lead Development Center
1-D04-100
2970 Market Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104
A request for a 90-day extension for submitting the complete voluntary disclosure package of information to the Austin campus could be submitted. This request needed to be sent to:
Internal Revenue Service
3651 S. I H 35 Stop 4301 AUSC
Austin, TX 78741
ATTN: 2011 Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Initiative
The questions and answers were updated as follows:
Q24.1: What if I cannot complete my Offshore Voluntary Disclosures Letter and send it to CI on or before the deadline?
* "The CPA's Guide to Life Insurance" by
Bisk CPEasy
* Avoiding Circular 230 Malpractice Traps
and Common Abusive Small Businesss Hot
spots by the AICPA, author/moderator
Lance Wallach
View my complete profile
www.lancewallach.com
ReplyDeleteAbusive Tax Shelters
412i, 419e plans litigation and IRS Audit Experts for abusive insurance based plans deemed reportable or listed transactions by the IRS.
Saturday, May 5, 2012
The IRS and Treasury have issued major warnings about abusive 419 Plans! We've been warning about them for some time.
Under § 419A(c)(2)(A), the reserve for post-retirement medical benefits is
further limited by the requirement that it be determined on the basis of current
medical costs. In addition, for post-retirement life insurance the maximum
insurance coverage that can be taken into account with respect to any covered
employee is $50,000 of coverage. Moreover, in the case of post-retirement
benefits for or on behalf of a key employee (as defined in § 416(i)(1)), § 419A(d)
requires that a separate account be established for any medical or life insurance
benefits provided with respect to the key employee, and any medical or life
insurance benefits provided with respect to the key employee after retirement
may only be paid from the separate account. Under § 419A(e)(1), in order for
reserves for post-retirement medical and life insurance benefits to be taken into
account the plan must meet the nondiscrimination requirements of § 505(b) with
respect to those benefits (even if those requirements do not otherwise apply to
the plan).
A plan meets the nondiscrimination requirements of § 505(b) only if (i)
each class of benefits under the plan is provided under a classification of
employees which is set forth in the plan and which is found b
Abusive Tax Shelters
ReplyDelete412i, 419e plans litigation and IRS Audit Experts for abusive insurance based plans deemed reportable or listed transactions by the IRS.
Saturday, May 5, 2012
The IRS and Treasury have issued major warnings about abusive 419 Plans! We've been warning about them for some time.
Under § 419A(c)(2)(A), the reserve for post-retirement medical benefits is
further limited by the requirement that it be determined on the basis of current
medical costs. In addition, for post-retirement life insurance the maximum
insurance coverage that can be taken into account with respect to any covered
employee is $50,000 of coverage. Moreover, in the case of post-retirement
benefits for or on behalf of a key employee (as defined in § 416(i)(1)), § 419A(d)
requires that a separate account be established for any medical or life insurance
benefits provided with respect to the key employee, and any medical or life
insurance benefits provided with respect to the key employee after retirement
may only be paid from the separate account. Under § 419A(e)(1), in order for
reserves for post-retirement medical and life insurance benefits to be taken into
account the plan must meet the nondiscrimination requirements of § 505(b) with
respect to those benefits (even if those requirements do not otherwise apply to
the plan).
A plan meets the nondiscrimination requirements of § 505(b) only if (i)
each class of benefits under the plan is provided under a classification of
employees which is set forth in the plan and which is found by the Secretary not
to be discriminatory in favor of employees who are highly compensated
individuals, and (ii) in the case of each class of benefits, such benefits do not
discriminate in favor of employees who are highly compensated individuals.
Under § 505(b)(3), in the case of any benefit for which another section of the
Code provides nondiscrimination rules (e.g., § 105(h) in the case of a selfinsured
medical reimbursement plan), those rules apply instead with respect to
the benefit. Under §§ 105(h)(8) and 414(t), all employees who are treated as
employed by a single employer under the rules of § 414(b), (c), or (m) are treated
as employed by a single employer for purposes of §§ 105(h), 79, and 505.
Sections 104(a)(3) and 105(b),(c), and (d) exclude from gross income
www.lancewallach.com
IRS Tax Shelters & 419 Plans Litigation
ReplyDelete412i, 419e plans litigation and IRS Audit Experts for abusive insurance based plans deemed reportable or listed transactions by the IRS.
Thursday, December 29, 2011
Small Business Retirement Plans Fuel Litigation
Maryland Trial Lawyer
Dolan Media Newswires January
Small businesses facing audits and potentially huge tax penalties over certain types of retirement plans are filing lawsuits against those who marketed, designed and sold the plans. The 412(i) and 419(e) plans were marketed in the past several years as a way for small business owners to set up retirement or welfare benefits plans while leveraging huge tax savings, but the IRS put them on a list of abusive tax shelters and has more recently focused audits on them.
The penalties for such transactions are extremely high and can pile up quickly.
There are business owners who owe taxes but have been assessed 2 million in penalties. The existing cases involve many types of businesses, including doctors’ offices, dental practices, grocery store owners, mortgage companies and restaurant owners. Some are trying to negotiate with the IRS. Others are not waiting. A class action has been filed and cases in several states are ongoing. The business owners claim that they were targeted by insurance companies; and their agents to purchase the plans without any disclosure that the IRS viewed the plans as abusive tax shelters. Other defendants include financial advisors who recommended the plans, accountants who failed to fill out required tax forms and law firms that drafted opinion letters legitimizing the plans, which were used as marketing tools.
A 412(i) plan is a form of defined benefit pension plan. A 419(e) plan is a similar type of health and benefits plan. Typically, these were sold to small, privately held businesses with fewer than 20 employees and several million dollars in gross revenues. What distinguished a legitimate plan from the plans at issue were the life insurance policies used to fund them. The employer would make large cash contributions in the form of insurance premiums, deducting the entire amounts. The insurance policy was designed to have a “springing cash value,” meaning that for the first 5-7 years it would have a near-zero cash value, and then spring up in value.
Just before it sprung, the owner would purchase the policy from the trust at the low cash value, thus making a tax-free transaction. After the cash value shot up, the owner could take tax-free loans against it. Meanwhile, the insurance agents collected exorbitant commissions on the premiums – 80 to 110 percent of the first year’s premium, which could exceed million.